HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KARTIK PAPNAI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders
S N L o . .
Date
o o r r d p ir r e o c c t e io e n d s in a g n s d
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
Registrar’s order with Signatures
WPMS 2604/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Adhikari, Standing
Counsel, for the Union of India.
Mr. Shashank Upadhyaya,
Advocate, for the respondent no. 2.
(2) Petitioner participated in NEET (UG) 2025, held by National Testing Agency. According to the petitioner, originally, his marks, as declared by National Testing Agency, were 555 out of 720, but subsequently the marks were revised and petitioner was given score card in which his score was mentioned as 21 out of 720. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the
following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of
mandamus/certiorari directing Respondent No. 2 (NTA) to produce before this Hon’ble Court the petitioner’s original OMR sheet, answer key, and evaluation records
pertaining to NEET-UG 2025.
(ii) Quash/set aside the
erroneous result showing 21 marks and direct the respondents to re-evaluate and restore the petitioner’s correct score of
555 marks (as initially reflected). (iii) Direct the Respondents to
allow the petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.