HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VED PRAKASH UPPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 2596 of 2025
09 September, 2025
Ved Prakash Uppal --Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Dabral, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State
of Uttarakhand/respondent No.1.
Mr. Ajay Joshi, learned counsel submits that he has got instruction to appear on behalf of respondent No.2. He may file his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2
during the course of day.
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)
By means of the present writ petition,
petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
1. To set aside/quash the order dated 02.11.2022 passed by
learned Tehsildar/Sadar, Dehradun in Case No.3544 of 2013, whereby, the name of Ratan Singh, which was mutated by an
earlier order, was confirmed.
2. To set aside/quash the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by the
learned Chairman, Board of Revenue, whereby, the revision of
the petitioner was dismissed.
3. To give the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing
any order before th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.