SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 671043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VED PRAKASH UPPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 2596 of 2025

09 September, 2025

Ved Prakash Uppal --Petitioner

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Anil Dabral, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State

of Uttarakhand/respondent No.1.

Mr. Ajay Joshi, learned counsel submits that he has got instruction to appear on behalf of respondent No.2. He may file his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2

during the course of day.

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

By means of the present writ petition,

petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

1. To set aside/quash the order dated 02.11.2022 passed by

learned Tehsildar/Sadar, Dehradun in Case No.3544 of 2013, whereby, the name of Ratan Singh, which was mutated by an

earlier order, was confirmed.

2. To set aside/quash the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by the

learned Chairman, Board of Revenue, whereby, the revision of

the petitioner was dismissed.

3. To give the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing

any order before th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top