HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
REKHA RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSS/ 1421/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Harendra Belwal, learned
counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, learned Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Davesh Upreti, learned counsel
for respondent no. 6.
4. Petitioner was selected for appointment as Anganwadi Sahayika in Angnwadi Centre Shalakwar, Block & Tehsil Okhalkanda, District Nainital. As per applicable policy, objections were invited against the result and respondent no. 6 filed objection contending that she is resident of the same revenue village, yet her application was rejected on the ground that she is not a resident of said village. Along with her objection, respondent no. 6 submitted evidence to show that she was born and brought up in the same revenue village i.e.
Shalakwar.
5. Report was also called from Tehsildar, who also endorsed the stand taken by respondent no. 6 that she belongs to same village. Appellate Authority cancelled the selection of petitioner and recommended respondent no. 6 for appointment due to her higher quality point marks. Thus, feeling agg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.