SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 676043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
REKHA RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS/ 1421/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Harendra Belwal, learned

counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, learned Standing

Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Davesh Upreti, learned counsel

for respondent no. 6.

4. Petitioner was selected for appointment as Anganwadi Sahayika in Angnwadi Centre Shalakwar, Block & Tehsil Okhalkanda, District Nainital. As per applicable policy, objections were invited against the result and respondent no. 6 filed objection contending that she is resident of the same revenue village, yet her application was rejected on the ground that she is not a resident of said village. Along with her objection, respondent no. 6 submitted evidence to show that she was born and brought up in the same revenue village i.e.

Shalakwar.

5. Report was also called from Tehsildar, who also endorsed the stand taken by respondent no. 6 that she belongs to same village. Appellate Authority cancelled the selection of petitioner and recommended respondent no. 6 for appointment due to her higher quality point marks. Thus, feeling agg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top