SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 691043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DINESH CHANDRA CHAMOLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1206 of 2025

Shyam Singh Panwar … Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & Others … Respondents

With

Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 39 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 55 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 58 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 59 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 61 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 64 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1203 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1204 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1209 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1210 of 2025 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1211 of 2025

Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional CSC, with Mr. Narayan Dutt,

Standing Counsel, for the State.

10.9.2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Since common questions of fact and law

are involved in these writ petitions, these are being heard and decided together by this common judgment. However, for brevity, facts of Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1206 of 2025 alone are being

considered and discussed here.

2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner

has sought the following reliefs:

“i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the

nature of certiorari to quash the impugned charge

sheet dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top