Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

CLR No. 63 of 2025

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

(through V.C.)

1. Mr. Vishwast Kandpal, learned counsel for the

revisionists.

2. Mrs. Monika Pant, learned counsel for the

respondents through V.C.

3. The instant revision has been preferred by the revisionists against the order dated 07.02.2025 passed by the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in SCC Suit No. 11 of 2020 ‘Pawan Kumar Agarwal & Others vs. Urmila Khatri & Others’, whereby the application moved by the revisionists for appointing a hand writing expert for the purposes of adjudicating the alleged signature of receipt regarding the acknowledgment

of payment of rent was rejected.

4. By the instant revision the revisionist sought a relief that the application moved by the revisionist be allowed by appointing a Forensic expert. The 2nd Additional District Judge rejected the application by observing therein that an endorsement of receipt in the visiting card infact is not a receipt and even otherwise the revisionist can adduce their evidence

during the proceeding of the suit.

5. Learned