SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 701043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UCO BANK – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS/ 2576/ 2025

With

WPMS/ 1775/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Siddhartha Sah & Mr. Sanjay

Gaur, Advocates for the petitioners.

2. Ms. Monika Pant, learned counsel

for the respondents.

3. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, both the petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No. 2576 of 2025 alone are being

considered.

4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following

reliefs:-

(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

certiorari to quash the provisional attachment order number 01/2024 in ECIR / 08 / PMLA / DNSZO / 2013 / AD(SK) / AEO(PS) / 1135 dt. 23.06.14 issued by respondent no. 1 against the properties mortgaged with the Petitioner (Contained in Annexure no. 2 to this writ

petition)

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

certiorari to quash the order dt. 07.11.2014 passed by Ld. Adjudicating Authority under section 8(3) of the PMLA issued by respondent no. 1 against the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top