HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UCO BANK – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS/ 2576/ 2025
With
WPMS/ 1775/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Siddhartha Sah & Mr. Sanjay
Gaur, Advocates for the petitioners.
2. Ms. Monika Pant, learned counsel
for the respondents.
3. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, both the petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No. 2576 of 2025 alone are being
considered.
4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following
reliefs:-
(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
certiorari to quash the provisional attachment order number 01/2024 in ECIR / 08 / PMLA / DNSZO / 2013 / AD(SK) / AEO(PS) / 1135 dt. 23.06.14 issued by respondent no. 1 against the properties mortgaged with the Petitioner (Contained in Annexure no. 2 to this writ
petition)
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
certiorari to quash the order dt. 07.11.2014 passed by Ld. Adjudicating Authority under section 8(3) of the PMLA issued by respondent no. 1 against the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.