HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIKRAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent
WPSS 2277 / 2024
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSS/ 2277/ 2024
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the
respondent.
2. Petitioner participated in a selection for the post of Surveyor in Government Industrial Training Institute and he was declared
successful in the preliminary examination.
3. As per applicable norms, every candidate who is declared successful in preliminary examination has to appear before the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (for short “Commission”) for document verification upto a certain date and only those candidates, who appeared for document verification, are
permitted to participate in mains examination.
4. Since petitioner could not appear for document verification within the deadline, indicated by Commission, therefore, he was denied permission to appear in the mains examination. Thus feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following
reliefs:
“(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature
of certiorari, quashing the order dated 21-11-2024 passed by respondent, rejecting the petitioner's request for being granted an opportunity for document
verification in the Government Industrial Training Institute Foreman Instructor Examination-2023 (Annexure No. 5 to this writ petition).
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding/directing the respondent to grant an opportunity to the petitioner for participating in the document verification process of the Government Industrial Training Institute Foreman Instructor Examination-2023.”
5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the website, although there were two folders for document verification; however, the deadline was not indicated in any of the folder.
6. Per contra, Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel appearing for the Commission refers to para 5 of the counter affidavit where it is stated that last date for document verification was communicated to all candidates by issuing advertisement in two newspapers, namely, Hindustan (Hindi daily) and Dainik Jagran (Hindi daily) on 10.10.2024.
7. He further submits that SMS were also sent to all candidates who qualified preliminary examination and information regarding deadline was also updated in the website. Thus he submits that it is the petitioner alone who is to be blamed for this fiasco.
8. Mr. Miglani, relies upon a judgment dated 04.09.2025, rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1460 of 2025 (SS), for contending that identical issue was decided and the relief was denied to a similarly situate candidate, who
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.