IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Civil Revision No. 52 of 2018

Brij Mohan Sharma. ………..Revisionist

Versus

Pooja alias Lila and another. ………….Respondents

Present

Mr. Pankaj Miglani, (through V.C.) Advocate for the revisionist.

Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, Advocate for respondent no. 2.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, J.(Through V.C)

1. The instant civil revision has been preferred by the plaintiff – revisionist against the order dated 09.04.2018 passed by 1st Addl. District Judge, Haridwar in SCC Suit No. 28 of 2013 (Brij Mohan Sharma VS. Pooja @ Lila) whereby impleadment application moved by respondent no. 2 – Mahamandaleshwar Swami Ved Vyasanand Ji Maharaj Sri Gita Ashram, International Charitable Trust Rishikesh, Tehsil Rishikesh, District Dehradun through its President Sri Deepak Gupta, was

allowed.

2. The aforesaid order isbeing challengedby the revisionist on the ground that 1st Addl. District Judge, Haridwar while allowing the application for impleadment has not considered that present suit is not aregular suit for determination of title and this suit is filed under the provisions of Small Causes Courts Act and in the present suit only question of relation of

tenant and