HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
Criminal Revision No.312 of 2020
12th September, 2025
Vinod Kumar ……..Revisionist
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and another ……… Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the
revisionist.
Mr. B. N. Maulekhi, learned DAG for the State.
Mr. Gulsan Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ganesh
Kandpal, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
This Criminal Revision has been filed
challenging the judgment & order dated 06.11.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bageshwar, District Bageshwar in Criminal Appeal No.17 of 2020, ‘Vinod Kumar Vs. Narendra Singh Danu and another’, whereby the appeal of the appellant/accused has been dismissed. Revisionist has also challenged the order dated 31.01.2020 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Bageshwar, District Bageshwar in Criminal
Case Nos.572 of 2018 and 785 of 2018 convicting the revisionist under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881.
2. Earlier a complaint was lodged against the applicant by the respondent no.2 under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.