SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 720043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No.312 of 2020

12th September, 2025

Vinod Kumar ……..Revisionist

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ……… Respondents

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the

revisionist.

Mr. B. N. Maulekhi, learned DAG for the State.

Mr. Gulsan Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ganesh

Kandpal, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

This Criminal Revision has been filed

challenging the judgment & order dated 06.11.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bageshwar, District Bageshwar in Criminal Appeal No.17 of 2020, ‘Vinod Kumar Vs. Narendra Singh Danu and another’, whereby the appeal of the appellant/accused has been dismissed. Revisionist has also challenged the order dated 31.01.2020 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Bageshwar, District Bageshwar in Criminal

Case Nos.572 of 2018 and 785 of 2018 convicting the revisionist under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881.

2. Earlier a complaint was lodged against the applicant by the respondent no.2 under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top