SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 730043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAN GIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE MANOJ KUMAR TI WARI

Writ Petition Service Single No. 2222 of 2022

12 September, 2025

Mohan Giri --Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & others --Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Karmanya Pandey, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal,

Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of

Uttarakhand/respondents.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is challenging the termination order

dated 29.11.2021 passed by Regional Director of Education (Secondary), Nainital. He has also challenged the order dated 06.04.2022 passed by Director, Secondary Education, whereby his appeal against

termination order was dismissed.

2. The facts, on which there is no dispute is that petitioner was initially appointed as Group ‘D’ employee in the year 1985 in a Government School. While serving as Group ‘D’ employee, petitioner obtained B.Ed. Degree from Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh in the year 1994 and on the strength of B.Ed. Degree, he was appointed as Assistant Teacher (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top