SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 736043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHARAD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

12TH SEPTEMBER, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.701 OF 2025

Sharad Kumar ..... Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Sandeep Sharma,

Assistant Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application has been filed by the applicant-

Sharad Kumar seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.17 of 2025, registered at Police Station Muni-ki-Reti, District Tehri Garhwal under Section 8 read with Section 21 and Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985.

2. According to the First Information Report, the police recovered 214.76 gram of smack on 12.02.2025 from

the possession of the co-accused Sunder. He was arrested.

3. Heard Mr. Kurban Ali, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Assistant

Government Advocate for the respondent.

4. Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate contended that the applicant is in poultry business. The informant used to buy chicken from him. That’s why the informant used to talk to

him on mobile phone. During the course of the investigat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top