SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 751043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AZAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

15TH SEPTEMBER, 2025

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS AP PLICATION NO. 528 OF 2019

Azad and five Others ..... Applicants

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Another ..…Respondents

Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. Mohd. Safdar,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, No.1. Assistant Government

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate.

No.2/informant-victim

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application under Section 482 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.329 of 2019, pending before the court of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 3 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,

1961.

2. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the

applicants-accused.

3. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned Assistant

Government Advocate for the respondent no.1.

4. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent no.2/informant-victim.

5. Both, Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the respondent no.2 submitted that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top