SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 752043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AKIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

22ND SEPTEMBER, 2025

SECOND BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 57 of 2025

Akil ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief

Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The First Bail Application (BA1 No.1655 of

2024) was rejected on 13.11.2024.

2. Applicant-Akil is in judicial custody for the offence under Sections 179, 180, 182(1) and Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No.25 of 2024, registered at Police Station

Mallital, District Nainital.

3. Heard Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief

Holder for the respondent.

4. Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate submitted that new ground for filing the present application is that the

charge-sheet has been filed and the statements of PW1 and PW2 have been recorded.

5. According to the prosecution, on 06.08.2024, the son of the informant was sitting in his shop. Two persons came there and bought goods. One of them took one currency note of Rs.500/- from his pocket and gave to the informant’s son and w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top