HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AKIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAI NI TAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
22ND SEPTEMBER, 2025
SECOND BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 57 of 2025
Akil ..…Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent
Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate.
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief
Holder.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The First Bail Application (BA1 No.1655 of
2024) was rejected on 13.11.2024.
2. Applicant-Akil is in judicial custody for the offence under Sections 179, 180, 182(1) and Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No.25 of 2024, registered at Police Station
Mallital, District Nainital.
3. Heard Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief
Holder for the respondent.
4. Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate submitted that new ground for filing the present application is that the
charge-sheet has been filed and the statements of PW1 and PW2 have been recorded.
5. According to the prosecution, on 06.08.2024, the son of the informant was sitting in his shop. Two persons came there and bought goods. One of them took one currency note of Rs.500/- from his pocket and gave to the informant’s son and w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.