HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HIMANSHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
BA1 No. 1697 of 2025
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Ms. Manju Bahuguna, learned
counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned A.G.A. for
the State.
3. Present applicant Himanshu, S/o Rampal is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 21.04.2025, bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0109 of 2025, registered at P.S. Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar wherein three persons namely Dharmendra, his wife Archana and Himansu were implicated along with some unknown person for the offences punishable under Section 109, 351 (2) of
Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita 2023.
4. On completion of the investigation, the present applicant and other co accused have been chargesheeted for the offences punishable under Section 109, 351 (2), 190, 191 (3) of Bhartiya
Nyay Sanhita 2023.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and furthermore, the other co-accused Dharmendra has already been enlarged on bail and she further argued that charge sheet has already been filed as such, there is no need of custodial
interrogation of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.