HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SAURABH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
proceedings
S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
and
Registrar’s order with Signatures
WPMS 1076/ 2024 WPMS 2965/ 2022 WPMS 3186/ 2022 WPMS 144/ 2023 WPMS 903/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Aakib Ahmed, Mr. Abhishek
Verma, Mr. Vishwa Prakash Bahuguna and Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Counsels for the
petitioners.
Mr. C.S. Rawat, Chief Standing
Counsel, with Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal,
Deputy AG, for the State.
Mr. Saurabh Adhikari, Central Govt.
Standing Counsel, for the Union of India.
Mr. Mayank Rajan Joshi, Advocate,
for the concessioner.
Mr. Vipul Sharma and Mr. Nivesh
Bahuguna, Counsel for the respondent no. 5.
Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani,
Advocate, for the intervener.
(2) Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these writ petitions, these are being heard and decided together
by this common judgment.
(3) Petitioners are transport operators. They are aggrieved by establishment of automated testing stations at different places in State of Uttarakhand. According to petitioners, the concessioner to whom contract for setting up automated testing stations is given does not fulfil the norms; the automated testing stations are being established a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.