SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 774043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SAURABH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and

Registrar’s order with Signatures

WPMS 1076/ 2024 WPMS 2965/ 2022 WPMS 3186/ 2022 WPMS 144/ 2023 WPMS 903/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Aakib Ahmed, Mr. Abhishek

Verma, Mr. Vishwa Prakash Bahuguna and Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Counsels for the

petitioners.

Mr. C.S. Rawat, Chief Standing

Counsel, with Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal,

Deputy AG, for the State.

Mr. Saurabh Adhikari, Central Govt.

Standing Counsel, for the Union of India.

Mr. Mayank Rajan Joshi, Advocate,

for the concessioner.

Mr. Vipul Sharma and Mr. Nivesh

Bahuguna, Counsel for the respondent no. 5.

Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani,

Advocate, for the intervener.

(2) Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these writ petitions, these are being heard and decided together

by this common judgment.

(3) Petitioners are transport operators. They are aggrieved by establishment of automated testing stations at different places in State of Uttarakhand. According to petitioners, the concessioner to whom contract for setting up automated testing stations is given does not fulfil the norms; the automated testing stations are being established a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top