SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 777043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
ARTI GARG – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

HON’BLE MR. G. NARENDAR, C.J.

HON’BLE MR. ASHI SH NAI THANI , J

Writ Petition (S/B) No. 350 of 2025

Union of India & Another ........ Petitioners

Versus

Dr. Arti Garg …..Respondent

Presence

Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, learned counsel for the Petitioners. Mr. Prateek Kanojia, learned counsel for the Respondent.

Per:Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The present writ petition, registered as WP (S/B) No. 350 of 2025, has

been filed by the Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Director, Botanical Survey of India, assailing the order dated 24 April 2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, while

sitting on circuit at Nainital, in Original Application No. 3475 of 2024.

2. By the said order, the Tribunal quashed the speaking order of the Ministry

dated 09 August 2024. It directed that the case of the Respondent, Dr. Arti Garg, Scientist ‘E’, be reconsidered for promotion to the grade of Scientist ‘F’ under the Flexible Complementing Scheme, by ignoring her Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (APARs) for the years 2021–22 and 2022– 23, and by conducting a review by the Departm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top