SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 783043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KRISHNA KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

17TH SEPTEMBER, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1057 OF 2025

Krishna Kashyap ..... Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal,

Assistant Government

Advocate with Mr.

Chitrarth Kandpal, Brief

Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application for anticipatory bail has been

filed by the applicant-Krishna Kashyap in Case Crime No.557 of 2025, registered at Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar under Section 109(1), Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 read with

Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.

2. According to the respondent, on 12.08.2025, co-accused Lakki had opened fire on the informant, which hit his thumb. The present applicant had taken

the co-accused Lakki away from the spot on a scooty.

3. Heard Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent.

4. Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He was not involved in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top