IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No.96 of 2020

18^th September, 2025

Neeraj Kala ……..Revisionist

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ……… Respondents

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Ms. Poonam Rauthan, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Rajat

Mittal, learned counsel for the revisionist.

Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

This Criminal Revision has been filed by the

revisionist challenging the judgment and order dated 02.01.2020 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Vikas Nagar Dehradun in Misc. Criminal Case No.94 of 2019, Yamini Uniyal Vs. Neeraj Kala’, whereby the Family Court allowed an application filed by respondent no.2 for seeking interim maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. with the direction to pay Rs.14,000/- per month

to respondent no.2.

2. Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that the court below has wrongly considered the income of the revisionist; that, court below has also failed to appreciate that the parents of the revisionist and his

20 years old sister are totally dep