SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 793043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAMMAD ULLAH KARIMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No.177 of 2020

18th September, 2025

Mohammad Ullah Karimi and others ……..Revisionists

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ……… Respondents

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the revisionists.

Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

Ms. Deepa Arya, learned counsel for respondent no.2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

This Criminal Revision has been filed by the

revisionists challenging the judgment and order dated 16.01.2020 passed by First Additional Session Judge, Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.39 of 2019, ‘Smt. Amina Tabassum Karimi Vs. State and others, whereby the Appellate Court allowed the appeal and respondent nos.2 and 3/revisionist nos.1 & 2 herein, were directed to pay Rs.3,000/- per month to respondent no.2 herein as

maintenance.

2. Learned counsel for the revisionists would submit that respondent no.2 filed an application before the Protection Officer against her real brother, sister and brother-in-law stating therein that she is a divorcee and residing in he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top