SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 797043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
SAVITRI – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Appeal From Order No. 251 of 2024

18 September, 2025

The New India Assurance Company ….…..Appellant

Versus

Savitri and others ………….Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. D C S Rawat, learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance

Company.

Ms. Sazia Parveen proxy counsel for Mr. Parikshit Sani, learned

counsel respondent nos. 1 to 5.

Despite sufficient service, none has put in appearance on behalf of

respondent no.7.

No representation for respondent no.8.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Mr. Alok Mahra, J.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred by the appellant/Insurance Company challenging the judgment and award dated 27.04.2024 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/1st Additional District Judge, Haridwar in M.A.C.P. No. 18 of 2020, whereby compensation of ₹15,37,250/- along with simple interest @ 6% per annum has been awarded in favour of the claimants/respondents against the appellant/Insurance

Company.

2. The case of the claimants, as pleaded in the claim petition, is that on 24.12.2018 at about 5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top