SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 804043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NEEL METAL KAMGAR SANGATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders

SL. or proceedings

Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

No or directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

WPMS 1569/ 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Yogesh Pacholia, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing

Counsel, for the State.

Mr. K.P. Upadhay, Senior

Advocate, assisted by Mr. Imran Ali Khan, Advocate for the respondent no. 5

and 6.

(2) This writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 18.9.2025 with a direction to the Conciliation Officer to conclude the conciliation proceedings within four weeks and it was provided that for a period of four weeks, status quo qua the posting of petitioner no. 2 to

5 shall be maintained.

(3) Today, the matter is listed on stay extension application (MCC/9/2025). Learned Counsel for the applicants/petitioners contends that the Conciliation Officer has forwarded his recommendation to the appropriate government and the appropriate government has to pass appropriate order under Section 4(k) of UP Industrial Disputes Act. He submits that employer is compelling the petitioners to join duties at the transferred places in different States. He submits that if petitioners join duties at transferred places, then it w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top