SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 808043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SURENDRA DUTT GAIROLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 335 of 2023

Surendra Dutt Gairola … Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & Others … Respondents

With

Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 568 of 2023 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 975 of 2023 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1345 of 2023 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 1899 of 2023 Writ Petition ( S/ S) No. 2246 of 2023

Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate, i/b Mr. M.C. Upadhyaya,

Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy AG, with Mr. Narayan Dutt,

Standing Counsel, for the State.

J U D G M E N T Inspector on 30.6.2022. According to petitioner, he is entitled to a sum of ₹12,58,059/- as gratuity, however a sum of ₹3,72,021/- has been illegally deducted and, as per the Pension/Gratuity Payment Order, the gratuity payable to him is shown as ₹8,86,038/- only. Petitioner has challenged deduction of the aforesaid amount from his gratuity.

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Petitioners were appointed as Constable

in Police Department and they retired upon completing the age of superannuation. They are aggrieved by recovery made from their retiral dues. 2. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these writ petitions, these are bei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top