HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
CHOLAMANDALAM M S GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
USHA PANDEY – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
A.O. No.128 of 2023
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Bharat Tewari, Advocate for the
appellant.
Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Sandeep
Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent nos.1 to
3.
Mr. B.S. Koranga, Advocate for
respondent nos.4 & 5.
2. This Appeal from Order has been filed by the Insurance Company, challenging the award dated 07.10.2022 passed by learned M.A.C.T./Ist Additional District Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital in M.A.C.P. No.
183 of 2019.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has assailed the impugned award on the specific ground that the learned Tribunal has erred in making deduction towards personal and living expenses of the deceased. It is contended that although there were three dependents of the deceased, the Tribunal wrongly applied a deduction of 1/4th from the annual income of the deceased; whereas, in accordance with the settled principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the appropriate deduction ought to have been 1/3rd in three dependents. In order to buttress his argument, learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance upon the judgment r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.