SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 828043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MAHESHANAND – Appellant
Versus
YATENDRA SINGH NEGI – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 2411 of 2025

19th September, 2025

Maheshanand and others ………..Petitioners

Versus

Yatendra Singh Negi and another …………Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Tribhuwan Chandra Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate for the respondents.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

This writ petition filed under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India by the petitioners is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.03.1969 (wrongly written 18.03.1969), passed by learned Assistant Collector, Pali, Ranikhet, Almora in Case No.20 of 1968- 69, annexure no.2 to the writ petition, as well as the judgment and order dated 23.07.2025, passed by the learned Commissioner, Kumaon Division, Nainital, in Revision No.9 of 2024-25 (Previous Revision No.60 of 2021-22), annexure no.8, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed as being highly time barred and the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condoning the delay has been

rejected.

2. The facts of the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top