HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR

AND

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY

Writ Petition Criminal No.1100 of 2025

19^th September, 2025

Pinki & Another ----Petitioners

versus

State Of Uttarakhand and others ----Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners

Mr. J.S. Virk, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Joshi, Brief Holder for the

State.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT: (per Sri Subhash Upadhyay, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of

Uttarakhand.

2. It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to different religions; that petitioner No. 1 is Hindu while petitioner No. 2 is Punjabi; that the petitioners wish to marry with each other, but respondent no.3 who is the father of the first petitioner is against the marriage and is giving out threats to them for dire consequences. It is

further submitted that both the petitioners are major.

3. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the

petitioners are major; they belong to different religions and are in a live-in relationship, thus, the State is under obligation to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners by private respondent.

4. In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection.

5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The SHO is further directed to summon the private respondent, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the relationship of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law.

6. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly.

7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

(G. NARENDAR, C.J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.)

Dated: 19.09.2025 Rajni RAJINI D D i N g : i t c a = l I y N s , i o g = n H e I d G b H y C R O A U JI R N T I G O U F SAIN 2 UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db48448ac 3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17d01342, GUSAINpostalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B4DF4 FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F530616A158A0 A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.09.24 10:15:20 +05'30'