SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 852043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
LOKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

1st Bail Application No.1907 of 2024

Lokesh Kumar ......Applicant

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand …..Respondent

Presence

Mr. Mukesh Rawat, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Shubhr Rastogi, learned

counsel for the applicant.

Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The present bail application has been filed by the Applicant, Lokesh Kumar, in connection with FIR No. 0265 of 2023, registered at Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. On 02.05.2023 at 18:46 hours, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegations in the FIR, lodged by the informant Smt. Surajmukhi @ Sarika, disclose that during revenue proceedings she came to know that her husband’s name had been deleted from the record and replaced by the name

of a purchaser.

2. Upon further inquiry, it was revealed that a sale deed had been executed and registered on 07.02.2023 in favour of one Chaman Lal for a stated consideration of ₹3,00,000/-. It was alleged that certain persons had entered into a criminal conspiracy, impersonated her husband Deepak Kumar, and fraudulently executed the sale deed using forged signatures and docu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top