SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 857043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ADITYA TOMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHISH NAITHANI

SECOND BAIL APPLICATION NO. 314 of 2024

Aditya Tomar …Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand …Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Abhishek Verma,

learned counsel.

Counsel for the State : Mr. Bhaskar Chandra

Joshi, learned A.G.A.

Counsel for the Complainant: Mr. Rajendra Singh

Azad, learned counsel.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

The present bail application has been filed by the

Applicant, Aditya Tomar, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), seeking release on bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 117 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 109 of 2022, registered at Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun, for the offences punishable under Section 302

of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act.

2. The FIR was lodged on 03.03.2022 at 20:31 hours by one Rakesh Bansal. It was alleged that at about 5:30 p.m. on the same day, his younger daughter sustained firearm injuries. Upon

inquiry, he came to know that the Applicant had fired upon her with a country-made pistol. The injured later succumbed to the injuries.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top