SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 859043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
BALISTER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

22ND SEPTEMBER, 2025

FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1715 of 2025

Balister ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant

Government Advocate with

Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, Brief

Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

Applicant-Balister is in judicial custody under

Section 109(1) and Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 3 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 in Case Crime No.254 of 2025,

registered at Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 03.08.2025, the applicant and two co-accused came to the main gate of the informant’s house at about 08.00 a.m. on 02.08.2025. Applicant had a gun and others had country made pistol. They opened fired

which hit Sushil and Vaibhav alias Vansh.

3. Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for

the applicant and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent.

4. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate contended that at the time of the incident, CCTV cameras were installed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top