SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 861043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
CHANDRA PRABHA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. KIRAN DUTT – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Civil Revision No. 121 of 2023

Chandra Prabha ………………… Petitioner

Versus

Kiran Dutta and Another ……………Respondents

With

Civil Revision No. 122 of 2023

Chandra Prabha ………………… Petitioner

Versus

Kiran Dutta and Another ……………Respondents

With

Civil Revision No. 123 of 2023

Chandra Prabha ………………… Petitioner

Versus

Kiran Dutta and Another ……………Respondents

Present:

Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Garg with Mr. Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. All these three revisions are arising out of execution proceeding initiated by the respondents for execution of the Trial Court judgment dated 28.01.2021 passed in three different SCC suits i.e. SCC Suit No. 11 of 2014, SCC Suit No. 12 of 2014 and SCC Suit No. 11 of 2014. In all these three SCC suits the present revisionist moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, but the same was rejected on 05.02.2016, against which three civil revisions were preferred, which were dismissed on 10.07.2017 by observing that if such an application moved under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC is allowed in the SCC suit then the whole litigation will be c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top