SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 863043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SMT. HEMA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH COLLECTOR NAINITAL. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (M/ S) No. 573 of 2007

Smt. Hema Devi … Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttaranchal & Others … Respondents

Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, Standing Counsel, for the State.

Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent no. 3 to 6.

J U D G M E N T In Suit No. 22/55, filed by Narayan Singh, petitioner was added as defendant no. 7; since Bhawani Dutt, original tenure holder, passed away before filing of suit by Narayan Singh, therefore, his legal representatives were added as defendants in the said suit. Petitioner filed counter-claim in the suit filed by Narayan Singh claiming bhumidhari right over the land belonging to Bhawani Dutt, by contending that it is she, and not Narayan Singh, who perfected title by adverse possession. Both suits were dismissed by learned Trial Court (Assistant Collector, 1st Class), vide common judgment dated 28.6.1993.

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

This writ petition, filed under Article 227 of

the Constitution, is directed against the judgment dated 28.6.1993, rendered by Assistant Collector, 1st Class, Haldwani in Suit No. 22/94 of 1986-87 (renumbered as Suit No. 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top