SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 881043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KULDEEP NANDRAJOG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

23RD SEPTEMBER, 2025

FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1692 of 2025

Kuldeep Nandrajog ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Sharang Dhulia, Advocate.

(through video conferencing).

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant

Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

Applicant-Kuldeep Nandrajog is in judicial

custody for the offence punishable under Section 420 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.406 of 2023, registered at Police Station

Bahadarabad, District Haridwar.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 11.10.2023, lodged by the informant Suresh Arora, M/S Octagon Builders and Promoters Private Ltd. allotted a plot to the informant in the year, 2008. He paid entire consideration i.e. Rs.7.00 lakh, but he has not been given possession of his plot. The said company was promoted by Mr. Kuldeep Nandrajog and

his father.

3. Heard Mr. Sharang Dhulia, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent.

4. Mr. Sharang Dhulia, Advocate, contended that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top