HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS/ 2738/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Deepak Petshali, learned counsel
for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel
for the respondent-Gaon Sabha.
4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- (i) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of
Mandamus directing the respondent no. 4 do not enter in petitioner land in compliance with the order dated 01.08.2019 passed by the Civil, Judge, Senior Division, Roorkee, District
Haridwar.
(ii) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of
Mandamus directing the respondent no. 4 not to restrain the petitioner’s from constructing on
their own land.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw prayer no. 1, as petitioner has instructed him not to press the said
prayer.
6. In such view of the matter, the relief, as claimed in prayer no. 2, alone is
considered.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is Bhumidhar in respect of land
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.