SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 887043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS/ 2738/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Deepak Petshali, learned counsel

for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing

Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel

for the respondent-Gaon Sabha.

4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- (i) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of

Mandamus directing the respondent no. 4 do not enter in petitioner land in compliance with the order dated 01.08.2019 passed by the Civil, Judge, Senior Division, Roorkee, District

Haridwar.

(ii) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of

Mandamus directing the respondent no. 4 not to restrain the petitioner’s from constructing on

their own land.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw prayer no. 1, as petitioner has instructed him not to press the said

prayer.

6. In such view of the matter, the relief, as claimed in prayer no. 2, alone is

considered.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is Bhumidhar in respect of land

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top