SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 893043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANJU DHAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS 525/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy AG, for

the State.

Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate,

for the respondent no. 3.

(2) Petitioner participated in a selection held by Uttarakhand Subordinate Services Selection Commission for the post of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade. Since the name of petitioner was not included in the list of successful candidates, therefore, she has filed this writ petition seeking the

following reliefs:

“i) Issue a writ of certiorari

quashing the revised answer key dated 10.01.2025 insofar as revised answers to Question Nos. 12 and 13 of Booklet Series- C are concerned (Annexed at Annexure No.

5 to the writ petition).

ii) Issue a writ, order or direction

in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 to review the revised answer key dated 10.01.2025, insofar as answers to Question Nos. 12 and 13 of Booklet Series-C are concerned and to eventually treat Option ‘B’ and ‘A’ as correct answers to Question No. 12 and 13 respectively, being in con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top