HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANJU DHAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSS 525/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy AG, for
the State.
Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate,
for the respondent no. 3.
(2) Petitioner participated in a selection held by Uttarakhand Subordinate Services Selection Commission for the post of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade. Since the name of petitioner was not included in the list of successful candidates, therefore, she has filed this writ petition seeking the
following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ of certiorari
quashing the revised answer key dated 10.01.2025 insofar as revised answers to Question Nos. 12 and 13 of Booklet Series- C are concerned (Annexed at Annexure No.
5 to the writ petition).
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction
in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 to review the revised answer key dated 10.01.2025, insofar as answers to Question Nos. 12 and 13 of Booklet Series-C are concerned and to eventually treat Option ‘B’ and ‘A’ as correct answers to Question No. 12 and 13 respectively, being in con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.