SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 896043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUNIL CHANDRA BAMRARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 1513 / 2025



Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS 1513/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Advocate, for

the petitioner.

Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional

CSC, for the State.

(2) According to petitioners, they were initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in Basic Schools run by Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board and they were later appointed as Head Master in Junior Basic Schools and upon State reorganisation, status of government servant was conferred upon them by virtue of Section 58 of Uttarakhand School Education Act. Thus, according to petitioners, they are entitled to the benefit of past services rendered in Junior Basic Schools also while determining

their eligibility for selection grade.

(3) By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following

reliefs:

“I- Issue a writ of mandamus,

commanding and directing the respondent to grant the benefit of Selection grade in the Grade pay of Rs. 5400/- by calculating the services rendered by the petitioners on the post of Headmaster in Government primary school/Assistant teacher Junior high school in the pay scale of Rs. 5500- 9000 before their merger in the cadre of Assistant teacher LT grade cadre, in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 as has been granted to the similarly situated person by issuing

Government order from time to time.

II- Issue a writ of mandamus,

commanding and directing the respondent

to revise and re-fix the salary of the petitioners by granting the benefit of the grade pay of Rs. 5400/- from the date petitioners were placed in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000/-.”

(4) Learned State Counsel submits that since petitioners have sought a writ of mandamus and they have also made representations before the competent authority, therefore, writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to competent authority to examine the claim of petitioners.

(5) Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of by directing Additional Director of Education, Garhwal Region, Pauri to consider and decide representation submitted by the petitioners within six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

23.9.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMARD2sn.iN5gU:4ePtcT:a=l0IyB Rs,3O5iog.DKn9H8eIdG3Nb1DMyC,P:s9Re5UAriBfTOlN+D1uFHmK'b3TU5erM=A70R4D3 KCaHf8N2ED1c, 5o0uC6=AH2IfGE1e aCBO49UR0T1E aOfD3FU8e0T6bA1RC98dK4H62BN5D083, po2sDtaFl6CodAe5=826370F1C, 957BE3,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top