SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 920043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANTOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS No. 2448 of 2024

With

WPSS No. 579 of 2024 WPSS No. 2494 of 2024

WPSS No. 32 of 2025

WPMS No. 774 of 2025 WPMS No. 775 of 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, learned Senior Counsel with Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Vikas Pande and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pacholia,

learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Narayan Dutt, learned Standing

Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for

the respondent-UPNL.

4. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel

for the respondent-University.

5. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPSS No. 579 of 2024 alone are being considered and

discussed.

6. Writ Petition (S/S) No. 579 of 2024 is filed by 44 persons, who were engaged on contract through UPNL for performing duties of Group ‘C’ and Group ‘D’ employees. According to petitioners, they were engaged in Uttarakhand Ayurved University between 2013 to 2021 and they continuously ser

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top