HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

Criminal Revision No.142 of 2025

Parvej ………Revisionist

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ………Respondents

Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the revisionist.

Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr.

Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

Judgment Reserved on 07.08.2025 Judgment deliverved on 25.09.2025

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.( Oral)

The present criminal revision has been

preferred by the revisionist challenging the order dated 21.01.2025/25.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional C.J.M., Roorkee, Haridwar whereby in relation to FIR No.0025 of 2025, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, under Sections 316(3), 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, the

revisionist was remanded to custody.

2. The factual matrix giving rise to the present proceedings is that the complainant/respondent no. 2 alleged that the revisionist, who was employed with Axis Bank, by taking undue advantage of the complainant and his brother’s illiteracy, hatched a conspiracy. The accounts of the complainant/respondent no.2 linked with his own mobile number, and thereafter transferred a sum of Rs.54,000,00/-from their accounts to his own accounts

and those of his re