SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 938043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NIRMAL PAL – Appellant
Versus
UP SAHCHALAK CHAKBANDI – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Single No.1275 of 2011

25 September, 2025

Nirmal Pal --Petitioner

Versus

Up Sanchalak Chakbandi and Ors. --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. T.A. Khan, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr.

Vinay Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned D.A.G. and Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Devendra Pant,

learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

None for the legal heirs of respondent No.4.

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

By means of the present writ petition,

petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.07.1992 passed by respondent No.3-Consolidation Officer, Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar as well as the order dated 30.03.2011 passed by respondent No.1-Upsanchalak Chakbandi/Additional District Magistrate, Udham Singh

Nagar in Case No.52/05 of 2004-05.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the father of petitioner Kallu had purchased a land Gata No.1065 area 5 Begha, Gata No.1074/1 area 2 Bigha 5 Visha, total area 7 Begha 5 Visha, Chak No.245 of present Khatoni No.213 (New Khatoni No.1006 area 0.3687 Hectare) through a reg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top