SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 958043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KULDEEP NANDRAJOG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

26th SEPTEMBER, 2025

FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1478 of 2025

Kuldeep Nandrajog ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Sharang Dhulia, Advocate.

(through video conferencing).

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Akshay Latwal, Assistant

Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

Applicant-Kuldeep Nandrajog is in judicial

custody for the offence punishable under Section 420 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.138 of 2024, registered at Police Station

Bahadarabad, District Haridwar.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 06.04.2024, the informant Smt. Anuradha Rastogi had invested a sum of Rs.5,90,000/- for a plot in the project namely, “Har Har Gange” with M/S Octagon Builders and Promoters Private Ltd., but, the builder has not yet provided her the possession of the

plot.

3. Heard Mr. Sharang Dhulia, learned counsel

for the applicant and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent.

4. Mr. Sharang Dhulia, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top