HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAHUL PARGAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSS/ 1597/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Tarun Prakash Singh Takuli, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the
State.
2. According to petitioner, his father was employed with forest department who died while still in service, on 17.01.2017. His further contention is that he is entitled for compassionate appointment; he made application for such appointment; however, his request was not acceded to. By means of this writ petition, following reliefs have been sought
by petitioner:
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
certiorari quashing the impugned order no. 5587/1-14 Pithoragarh, dated 18, March, 2025 passed by respondent no. 3, by which the respondent no. 3 has informed the petitioner that presently there is no provision for giving appointment to a dependent of daily wager under dying in harness rules. (Annexure no.
1 to the writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature
of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner under dying in harness rules on regular bas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.