SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 980043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RESHMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 840 of 2024

02 DECEMBER, 2025

Reshma … Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of

Uttarakhand.

Mr. Arvind Vashisth, learned Senior Counsel for respondent no. 7

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner was elected as Pradhan of Gram Sabha Nagla Khurd, Block Bhadrabad, District Haridwar in the last election held in 2022. A complaint was made that she does not possess the requisite educational qualification for holding the Office as Pradhan. Copy of the complaint was supplied to petitioner and a notice was also issued to her, asking her to put forth her version. In her reply, petitioner stated that she passed 8th Standard from Shanti Modern Junior High School, Bhauri Bharapur, Roorkee, District Haridwar, during

Academic Session 2007-08.

2. The complaint was referred to Deputy Education Officer (Roorkee), Haridwar for enquiry. Deputy Education Offi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top