SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 991043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANJAY DOBHAL AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL. Dat or directions

No. e and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures 2025:UHC:8778

WPCRL No.1116 of 2025

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Avtar Singh Rawat, learned senior counsel for the

Petitioners.

2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned AGA, for the State of

Uttarakhand/1 and 2.

3. The present petitioners have put a challenge to the FIR No.48 of 2025, dated 06.09.2025, which was registered at Police Station Barkot, District Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand for their alleged involvement in commission of the offences under Sections 126,

191 (2) of B.N.S, 2023.

4. As far as the offence under Sections 126, 191 (2) of B.N.S. 2023 is concerned, it carry a sentence of less than seven years, and it will be covered by the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matters of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State Of Bihar” reported in 2014 (8) SCC 273, where the applicant is required to surrender before the court and seek his bail. However, the said benefit of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar”, would be extended to the petitioners, subject to the condition that they cooperate with the investigation and render full support to the

respondent no.2.

5. In view of the afor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top