SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1000043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAMMAD ADIL – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Bench No. 823 of 2025

7th October, 2025

Mohammad Adil …….Petitioner

Versus

Assistant Commissioner ……Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Pankaj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram: Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner

seeks following reliefs:

(a) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of

certiorari quashing the impugned order bearing Reference No.ZD0510220052639 and dated 21.10.2022

issued by the Respondent No.1 (Annexure-1);

(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari

quashing the impugned Show Cause Notice bearing Reference No.ZD050622002089R and dated 06.06.2022

issued by the Respondent No.1 (Annexure-2);

(c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

mandamus directing the respondent from taking any coercive steps in regard to the Order dated 21.10.2022

(Annexure-1);

(d) Issue any other writ, order or directio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top