SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1011043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIRENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 3661 (S/S) of 2017

Virendra Singh --------------Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others ----------Respondents

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. M.C.Pant through V.C. and Mr. Deepak Joshi, learned counsel

for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, J.

The petitioner has filed the present Writ

Petition with the following prayers:

(i) Issue a writ rule, order or direction in the nature of

certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 05.09.2017 after calling the entire record along with its effect and operation also and also the rules of regularization rules prescribing the condition the existence of sanctioned and vacant post for the purpose of regularization and the same requirement for considering the regularization of an employee and reading down the same as per the mandate of the Hon’ble Apex Court, so the legitimate and lawful claim of the bona fide employee may not be defeated on account of bureaucratic veil in view of the fact

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top