SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972052

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KAVITA SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

07th OCTOBER, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 713 of 2025

Smt. Kavita Sarkar and others .....Applicants

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Pooran Singh

Rawat, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. G.S. Sandhu,

Additional Advocate

General assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief

Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application for anticipatory bail has been

filed in Case Crime No. 103 of 2025, registered at Police Station Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar under Sections 115(2), 318(4), 351(2) and Section 352 of the

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 22.06.2025, the applicants took Rs. 24,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Four Lakh) from the informant to sell the property

but they did not execute sale-deed.

3. Heard Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, learned counsel for applicants and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned

Additional Advocate General for respondent.

4. Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate, contended that the unregistered agreement was signed by only the applicant no.2 and rest of the applicants agreed to sign the agreement after r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top