SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972057

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AHATSHAM ALIAS FITAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

08TH OCTOBER, 2025

FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.1850 of 2025

Ahatsham alias Fitan ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The applicant is in judicial custody for the

offence under Section 8 read with Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “Act, 1985”) in Case Crime No.646 of 2025,

registered at Police Station Manglaur, District Haridwar.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 23.09.2025, the police apprehended the applicant and recovered 15.05 gm. smack from his

possession.

3. Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief

Holder for respondent.

4. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate contended that

the applicant is an innocent person. He has been falsely implicated by the police. Nothing was recovered from his possession. There was no independent witness at the time of the alleged recovery. This fact also supports the submission of the applicant. Applicant h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top