SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972086

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
PRAHLAD SINGH BARFAL – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Appeal from Order No.207 of 2014

09th October, 2025

United India Insurance

Company Ltd. ………….Appellant

Versus

Prahlad Singh Barfal ……..Respondent

With

Appeal from Order No.208 of 2014

United India Insurance

Company Ltd. ………….Appellant

Versus

Prahlad Singh Barfal ……..Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Naresh Pant, Advocate for the appellant, through video

conferencing.

Mr. Tarun Pande, Advocate for the respondent, through video

conferencing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

These two appeals have arisen out of a

common accident and involve identical questions of fact and law. Therefore, both the appeals are being disposed

of together by this common judgment.

2. Both appeals have been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the appellant- United India Insurance Company Ltd., assailing the awards dated 20.02.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/First Additional District Judge, Nainital, in two separate claim petitions arising from the same

accident. In Appeal No.207 of 2014, the Tribunal awarded compensation of ₹

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top