SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972088

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJPAL ALIAS RAJPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Appeal From Order No. 369 of 2022

09th October, 2025

Rajpal Alias Rajpal Singh and Others ……..Appellants

Versus

National Insurance Company Limited and Others

……Respondents

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Mangha Ram Kashyap, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Ashish Belwal, proxy counsel for Mr. Lalit Belwal, learned

counsel for respondent no.1/Insurance Company.

Mr. Bhupendra Prasad, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3. ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Mr. Alok Mahra, J.

This appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988, has been preferred by the appellants/claimants against the judgment and order dated 24.06.2022 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Pauri Garhwal, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants was

returned on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.

2. Brief facts of the case, as per record, are that on 22.01.2020, a motor accident occurred in District Shamli, Uttar Pradesh, involving a motorcycle bearing registration no. UP12AR1710 allegedly driven rashly and negligentl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top