SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972098

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KULDEEP NANDRAJOG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

10th OCTOBER, 2025

FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1475 of 2025

Kuldeep Nandrajog ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Sharang Dhulia,

Advocate

( throu g h vid eo conferencing)

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey,

Assistant Government

Advocate assisted by Mr. Prabhat Kandpal,

Brief Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

Applicant-Kuldeep Nandrajog is in judicial

custody for the offence punishable under Section 420 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.149 of 2024, registered at Police Station

Bahadarabad, District Haridwar.

2. The informant Smt. Soniya Tyagi lodged the First Information Report against three persons including the present applicant on 08.04.2024 alleging that she had invested a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- for a plot with M/S Octagon Builders and Promoters Private Ltd. The

builder has not yet handed over the plot to her. The builder is now allotting the undeveloped plot.

3. Heard Mr. Sharang Dhulia, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent.

4. Mr. Sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top