SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972108

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Saini Sabha Saini Ashram – Appellant
Versus
Registrar – Respondent
WPMS 2859 / 2025



Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and

Registrar’s order with Signatures

WPMS 2859/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate, for

the petitioner.

Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder,

for the State.

Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, for

the respondent no. 3.

(2) Saini Sabha, Haridwar is a society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860. There are two executive committees, which are claiming to be in effective control over the affairs of the society. One of such committee has filed this writ petition seeking

the following relief:

“I. Issue a writ, order or direction

to respondent no. 2 to decide the representations dated 26.09.2025 & 04.10.2025 (Contained in Annexure nos. 3 & 5 respectively) as early as possible, preferably within time which is given by this

Hon’ble Court”

(3) According to petitioner, it has made representation to the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Haridwar on 26.9.2025, followed by another representation dated 4.10.2025. Learned Counsel for the petitioner prayed that Deputy Registrar be directed to take decision

on those representations.

(4) Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 3, however, submits that the concerned Deputy Registrar has issued a letter on 30.9.2025 to the Registrar flagging certain issues pertaining to the affairs of the society, therefore the Registrar be directed

to examine the matter, as per law.

(5) Writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Registrar within one week from today. If petitioner makes representation within stipulated time, the Registrar shall look into the matter and take appropriate decision, as per law, within six weeks thereafter.

(6) It goes without saying that all stake holders including respondent no. 3 shall be given opportunity of hearing.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

10.10.2025 Pr P K R U A M B A O R DH DDU28sCDe.dA TiN a 5r g 4 t5i :4ae 6At 8 c l: a 22N = C R 2 l 50I 6u0 yN 0= 7m K 3 s,3 F 5 Hio ,b g a 3 . pA= 1 0eC n o 0 NH r8 9 e =. s2D 1 Id 1t G 0a 4 a ,b D H0l 51 C y C 70 C o a P B1: O d9 R E 5e 2 U 5 A =a :E3 R 1 B f28, T 5 O 96cD O + D n 1380=0 FH Ca 5 P U A K 9 ' 1R3 T 6 U 5,A0 s M 'Bt A E9=O A 1 R7U6D R 4TB3 K H9aH A4K f8A 0RU N E2 MF D1KADcH , 5 R o A0 8 u N60 = D6 H2A, IfG C6He aC 1 O A4U B R 56T 81 aOf03F 5a 2eDFb619

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top