SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972109

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DARIYAB SINGH NEGI – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LTD – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE MANOJ KUMAR TI WARI

Writ Petition Service Single No. 337 of 2025

17 November, 2025

Dariyab Singh Negi --Petitioner

Versus

Managing Director, Uttarakhand

Power Corporation Ltd. & others. --Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Anil K. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 4.

--------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT

Respondent nos. 5 & 6 were directed to be

served personally as well as by Registered Post. As per office report, both the respondents are duly served,

however, there is no one to represent them.

2. Petitioner was appointed as Office Assistant, Grade-III on daily wages w.e.f. 17.10.1984 and he was regularized on the post of Office Assistant, Grade-III w.e.f. 1.4.1988. He was promoted to the higher post i.e. Office Assistant, Grade-II w.e.f. 30.01.2006; he was thereafter promoted as Office Superintendent, Grade-II w.e.f. 7.1.2021; and he was lastly promoted as Office Superintendent, Grade-I w.e.f. 5.4.2023. Petitioner is aggrieved by promotion given to respondent no. 5 to the post of Office Superintendent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top